Post by account_disabled on Mar 8, 2024 22:45:08 GMT -5
Perpetrators of the attack, collaborators, victims, family members, investigators – and also of the professionals themselves who intervene in the trial, the lawyers of the civil parties, the defenders, the prosecution, the court, and Carrére subtly incorporates it throughout the many chapters into which the book is divided and which leads in an entertaining way to an understanding of the totality of the attacks and the shadow that they cast. . The civil parties, who will appear at the trial seeking moral reparation, the authentic victims of the attack who coexist and must be differentiated from the rebound victims or accidental witnesses, already hear on the second day the voice of the main accused, the star of the trial, Salah Abdeslam, the only accused who had to have exploded his belt, the so-called “breakdown defense”, when he asks if those suffering from the bombings in Syria and Iraq will also be given the floor.
This allows Carrère to reflect on this defense, theorized in 1987 during the trial of Nazi officer Klaus Barbie by lawyer Jacques Vergés, and to focus on the events of November 13 with an appropriate perspective. Technique that he will repeat later when contextualizing those involved in the attacks. Their thesis is clear, the attacks are a legitimate reaction to the state terrorism practiced by France, first in Iraq and then in Syria, "you massacre innocents there and we come to massacre innocents here." The human perspective is projected on both the victims and the perpetrators of the attack; of these he makes a precise USA Phone Number psychological, sociological and cultural profile. It reflects on the visions of each other, humanizing all of them, integrating their experiences and wondering how some have gotten to where they have. It introduces anecdotes that reveal the pain of many others, the relatives of the victims and the perpetrators of the attacks, of the different perception we have of each other, as if they were to some extent responsible for the actions of their children. The question of who are victims and who are executioners is blurred.
Nor does he spare any effort on details that might seem secondary or superfluous, such as when mentioning what he calls “The price of tears” that is, the compensation that corresponds to each of the victims, rather to the concepts by which these are granted and that are not elucidated in this trial but in another venue and before another court, but for whose satisfaction the French state , unique in the world, has created a guarantee fund to which each Frenchman contributes 5,90 euros annually. Or to explain what he calls “The price of words”, highlighting the enormous amount of money that is allocated for jurisdictional aid, since in casos of terrorism is applied regardless of whether or not there are resources to cover the attorney's fees, the imbalance that occurs in the remuneration, work and dedication of defense lawyers and lawyers for civil parties and the different projection of some and others at trial. Or to mention some errors of the investigators, some recognized and others not, or the lapses of the president of the Court, which although they may seem minor, do not go unnoticed by the public and from which we can obtain some lessons; Each sentence, each intervention of a member of the Court is important and the descriptions of the facts, the suffering or the consequences made by the victims cannot or should not be described as repetitive, or forget to mention the accused when the crime is announced as painful.
This allows Carrère to reflect on this defense, theorized in 1987 during the trial of Nazi officer Klaus Barbie by lawyer Jacques Vergés, and to focus on the events of November 13 with an appropriate perspective. Technique that he will repeat later when contextualizing those involved in the attacks. Their thesis is clear, the attacks are a legitimate reaction to the state terrorism practiced by France, first in Iraq and then in Syria, "you massacre innocents there and we come to massacre innocents here." The human perspective is projected on both the victims and the perpetrators of the attack; of these he makes a precise USA Phone Number psychological, sociological and cultural profile. It reflects on the visions of each other, humanizing all of them, integrating their experiences and wondering how some have gotten to where they have. It introduces anecdotes that reveal the pain of many others, the relatives of the victims and the perpetrators of the attacks, of the different perception we have of each other, as if they were to some extent responsible for the actions of their children. The question of who are victims and who are executioners is blurred.
Nor does he spare any effort on details that might seem secondary or superfluous, such as when mentioning what he calls “The price of tears” that is, the compensation that corresponds to each of the victims, rather to the concepts by which these are granted and that are not elucidated in this trial but in another venue and before another court, but for whose satisfaction the French state , unique in the world, has created a guarantee fund to which each Frenchman contributes 5,90 euros annually. Or to explain what he calls “The price of words”, highlighting the enormous amount of money that is allocated for jurisdictional aid, since in casos of terrorism is applied regardless of whether or not there are resources to cover the attorney's fees, the imbalance that occurs in the remuneration, work and dedication of defense lawyers and lawyers for civil parties and the different projection of some and others at trial. Or to mention some errors of the investigators, some recognized and others not, or the lapses of the president of the Court, which although they may seem minor, do not go unnoticed by the public and from which we can obtain some lessons; Each sentence, each intervention of a member of the Court is important and the descriptions of the facts, the suffering or the consequences made by the victims cannot or should not be described as repetitive, or forget to mention the accused when the crime is announced as painful.